Magnetic particle testing method for crane hooks

2025-07-28 09:10:16

Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) is a non-destructive testing technology used to detect surface and near-surface defects (cracks, folds, inclusions, etc.) of ferromagnetic materials (such as crane hooks). Its principle is to use a magnetic field to generate a leakage magnetic field at the defect, which absorbs magnetic particles to form a visible indication.


1. Scope of application

  1. Applicable materials : ferromagnetic materials (carbon steel, alloy steel, etc.).

  2. Detection defect type :

    • Surface cracks (such as fatigue cracks, stress cracks)

    • Near surface defects (depth ≤ 5 mm)

    • Welding defects (such as lack of fusion, porosity)

  3. Applicable standards :

    • GB/T 15822-2020 Non-destructive testing - magnetic particle testing

    • JB/T 6061-2007 Test pieces for non-destructive testing of magnetic particle

    • TSG Q7015-2016 (Rules for Periodic Inspection of Lifting Machinery)


2. Testing equipment and materials

project Require
Magnetization equipment AC/DC yoke, portable magnetic particle flaw detector (magnetizing current ≥ 1000A)
Magnetic Powder Type Fluorescent magnetic particles (UV light detection) or black/red non-fluorescent magnetic particles
Carrier fluid Water-based or oil-based suspension (in accordance with JB/T 6063 standard)
UV light (optional) Wavelength 365nm, intensity ≥1000μW/cm² (fluorescence method)
Standard test piece Type A1 (30/100μm) or Type C (for sensitivity verification)

3. Preparation before testing

1. Hook surface treatment

  • Cleaning : Remove oil, rust and paint (grind to Ra≤12.5μm).

  • Drying : Make sure there is no moisture on the surface to avoid affecting the adsorption of magnetic powder.

2. Magnetization method selection

Magnetization method Applicable scenarios Pros and Cons
Yoke method (AC/DC) Local inspection (hook neck, hook bottom) Portable, but requires multiple magnetization
Power-on method (direct power-on) Overall inspection (hook handle) Large detection depth, but good contact is required
Coil method (indirect magnetization) Long rod-like parts (hook handle thread) Suitable for longitudinal crack detection

3. Sensitivity Verification

  • Use A1 test piece (30/100μm) to stick on the test area, and the magnetic traces should be clearly displayed after magnetization.


4. Testing steps

  1. magnetization

    • Yoke method : pole spacing ≤ 200mm, magnetization time 1~3 seconds.

    • Continuous method : Magnetizing while applying magnetic powder (recommended).

    • Residual magnetism method : only applicable to materials with high residual magnetism (magnetization is required before powder spraying).

  2. Applying magnetic powder

    • Wet method : spray magnetic suspension (concentration 1.5~3.0g/L).

    • Dry method : suitable for rough surfaces (such as thread roots).

  3. Observation and Recording

    • Under natural light (non-fluorescent magnetic powder): black/red magnetic traces.

    • Under UV light (fluorescent magnetic powder): bright green magnetic traces (more sensitive).

    • Take photos and archive : record the defect location, length and shape.

  4. Demagnetization (if necessary)

    • If the hook needs to be machined later or to avoid magnetic field interference, it needs to be demagnetized with a demagnetizer.


V. Defect Assessment and Acceptance Criteria

1. Common defect magnetic trace characteristics

Defect Type Magnetic trace characteristics
crack Slender, tortuous, with obvious magnetic powder aggregation
fold Straight or curved, consistent with the processing direction
Pores Point-shaped or short-strip scattered magnetic traces
Inclusion Irregular cluster magnetic traces

2. Acceptance criteria (GB/T 15822)

  • Not allowed :

    • Any visible cracks or transverse defects .

    • Linear defect length >2mm (critical stress area).

  • Allowed :

    • Single point defect ≤ 1mm , spacing ≥ 10mm .


6. Safety precautions

  1. Explosion-proof requirements : Oil-based carrier fluids are prohibited in flammable environments.

  2. UV protection : Wear UV-proof glasses during fluorescent testing.

  3. Equipment inspection : The yoke is well insulated to avoid the risk of electric shock.


7. Magnetic Particle Testing vs. Ultrasonic Testing (UT)

Comparison Items Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) Ultrasonic testing (UT)
Detection depth Surface/near surface (≤5mm) Internal (up to several hundred mm)
Defect Type Cracks, folds, pores Cracks, inclusions, delamination
efficiency High (fast scan) Medium (need coupling agent)
Applicable Materials Ferromagnetic materials only Metal/non-metal

Recommendation : MT+UT combined testing should be used for the key stress-bearing areas of the hook (hook neck and hook bottom) .


8. Typical Cases

  • Case 1 : crane hook fracture accident in a steel plant

    • MT testing found : 3mm fatigue crack in the hook neck transition area.

    • Cause : Long-term overload + corrosion leads to crack expansion.

  • Case 2 : Cracking of weld seam of port hook anti-drop device

    • MT detection found : unfused defects in the heat affected zone of welding.


IX. Future Development Trends

  1. Automated magnetic particle testing : robot scanning + AI image recognition.

  2. High-sensitivity magnetic powder : Nano magnetic powder improves the detection rate of tiny defects.


Summarize

Magnetic particle testing is the preferred method for detecting surface defects on crane hooks . It is easy to operate, low cost and highly sensitive. It must be strictly implemented according to the standards and combined with ultrasonic testing (UT) for all-round testing to ensure the safe use of the hook.

Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) is a non-destructive testing technology used to detect surface and near-surface defects (cracks, folds, inclusions, etc.) of ferromagnetic materials (such as crane hooks). Its principle is to use a magnetic field to generate a leakage magnetic field at the defect, which absorbs magnetic particles to form a visible indication.


1. Scope of application

  1. Applicable materials : ferromagnetic materials (carbon steel, alloy steel, etc.).

  2. Detection defect type :

    • Surface cracks (such as fatigue cracks, stress cracks)

    • Near surface defects (depth ≤ 5 mm)

    • Welding defects (such as lack of fusion, porosity)

  3. Applicable standards :

    • GB/T 15822-2020 Non-destructive testing - magnetic particle testing

    • JB/T 6061-2007 Test pieces for non-destructive testing of magnetic particle

    • TSG Q7015-2016 (Rules for Periodic Inspection of Lifting Machinery)


2. Testing equipment and materials

project Require
Magnetization equipment AC/DC yoke, portable magnetic particle flaw detector (magnetizing current ≥ 1000A)
Magnetic Powder Type Fluorescent magnetic particles (UV light detection) or black/red non-fluorescent magnetic particles
Carrier fluid Water-based or oil-based suspension (in accordance with JB/T 6063 standard)
UV light (optional) Wavelength 365nm, intensity ≥1000μW/cm² (fluorescence method)
Standard test piece Type A1 (30/100μm) or Type C (for sensitivity verification)

3. Preparation before testing

1. Hook surface treatment

  • Cleaning : Remove oil, rust and paint (grind to Ra≤12.5μm).

  • Drying : Make sure there is no moisture on the surface to avoid affecting the adsorption of magnetic powder.

2. Magnetization method selection

Magnetization method Applicable scenarios Pros and Cons
Yoke method (AC/DC) Local inspection (hook neck, hook bottom) Portable, but requires multiple magnetization
Power-on method (direct power-on) Overall inspection (hook handle) Large detection depth, but good contact is required
Coil method (indirect magnetization) Long rod-like parts (hook handle thread) Suitable for longitudinal crack detection

3. Sensitivity Verification

  • Use A1 test piece (30/100μm) to stick on the test area, and the magnetic traces should be clearly displayed after magnetization.


4. Testing steps

  1. magnetization

    • Yoke method : pole spacing ≤ 200mm, magnetization time 1~3 seconds.

    • Continuous method : Magnetizing while applying magnetic powder (recommended).

    • Residual magnetism method : only applicable to materials with high residual magnetism (magnetization is required before powder spraying).

  2. Applying magnetic powder

    • Wet method : spray magnetic suspension (concentration 1.5~3.0g/L).

    • Dry method : suitable for rough surfaces (such as thread roots).

  3. Observation and Recording

    • Under natural light (non-fluorescent magnetic powder): black/red magnetic traces.

    • Under UV light (fluorescent magnetic powder): bright green magnetic traces (more sensitive).

    • Take photos and archive : record the defect location, length and shape.

  4. Demagnetization (if necessary)

    • If the hook needs to be machined later or to avoid magnetic field interference, it needs to be demagnetized with a demagnetizer.


V. Defect Assessment and Acceptance Criteria

1. Common defect magnetic trace characteristics

Defect Type Magnetic trace characteristics
crack Slender, tortuous, with obvious magnetic powder aggregation
fold Straight or curved, consistent with the processing direction
Pores Point-shaped or short-strip scattered magnetic traces
Inclusion Irregular cluster magnetic traces

2. Acceptance criteria (GB/T 15822)

  • Not allowed :

    • Any visible cracks or transverse defects .

    • Linear defect length >2mm (critical stress area).

  • Allowed :

    • Single point defect ≤ 1mm , spacing ≥ 10mm .


6. Safety precautions

  1. Explosion-proof requirements : Oil-based carrier fluids are prohibited in flammable environments.

  2. UV protection : Wear UV-proof glasses during fluorescent testing.

  3. Equipment inspection : The yoke is well insulated to avoid the risk of electric shock.


7. Magnetic Particle Testing vs. Ultrasonic Testing (UT)

Comparison Items Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) Ultrasonic testing (UT)
Detection depth Surface/near surface (≤5mm) Internal (up to several hundred mm)
Defect Type Cracks, folds, pores Cracks, inclusions, delamination
efficiency High (fast scan) Medium (need coupling agent)
Applicable Materials Ferromagnetic materials only Metal/non-metal

Recommendation : MT+UT combined testing should be used for the key stress-bearing areas of the hook (hook neck and hook bottom) .


8. Typical Cases

  • Case 1 : Crane hook fracture accident in a steel plant

    • MT testing found : 3mm fatigue crack in the hook neck transition area.

    • Cause : Long-term overload + corrosion leads to crack expansion.

  • Case 2 : Cracking of weld seam of port hook anti-drop device

    • MT detection found : unfused defects in the heat affected zone of welding.


IX. Future Development Trends

  1. Automated magnetic particle testing : robot scanning + AI image recognition.

  2. High-sensitivity magnetic powder : Nano magnetic powder improves the detection rate of tiny defects.


Summarize

Magnetic particle testing is the preferred method for detecting surface defects on crane hooks . It is easy to operate, low cost and highly sensitive. It must be strictly implemented according to the standards and combined with ultrasonic testing (UT) for all-round testing to ensure the safe use of the hook.

Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) is a non-destructive testing technology used to detect surface and near-surface defects (cracks, folds, inclusions, etc.) of ferromagnetic materials (such as crane hooks). Its principle is to use a magnetic field to generate a leakage magnetic field at the defect, which absorbs magnetic particles to form a visible indication.


1. Scope of application

  1. Applicable materials : ferromagnetic materials (carbon steel, alloy steel, etc.).

  2. Detection defect type :

    • Surface cracks (such as fatigue cracks, stress cracks)

    • Near surface defects (depth ≤ 5 mm)

    • Welding defects (such as lack of fusion, porosity)

  3. Applicable standards :

    • GB/T 15822-2020 Non-destructive testing - magnetic particle testing

    • JB/T 6061-2007 Test pieces for non-destructive testing of magnetic particle

    • TSG Q7015-2016 (Rules for Periodic Inspection of Lifting Machinery)


2. Testing equipment and materials

project Require
Magnetization equipment AC/DC yoke, portable magnetic particle flaw detector (magnetizing current ≥ 1000A)
Magnetic Powder Type Fluorescent magnetic particles (UV light detection) or black/red non-fluorescent magnetic particles
Carrier fluid Water-based or oil-based suspension (in accordance with JB/T 6063 standard)
UV light (optional) Wavelength 365nm, intensity ≥1000μW/cm² (fluorescence method)
Standard test piece Type A1 (30/100μm) or Type C (for sensitivity verification)

3. Preparation before testing

1. Hook surface treatment

  • Cleaning : Remove oil, rust and paint (grind to Ra≤12.5μm).

  • Drying : Make sure there is no moisture on the surface to avoid affecting the adsorption of magnetic powder.

2. Magnetization method selection

Magnetization method Applicable scenarios Pros and Cons
Yoke method (AC/DC) Local inspection (hook neck, hook bottom) Portable, but requires multiple magnetization
Power-on method (direct power-on) Overall inspection (hook handle) Large detection depth, but good contact is required
Coil method (indirect magnetization) Long rod-like parts (hook handle thread) Suitable for longitudinal crack detection

3. Sensitivity Verification

  • Use A1 test piece (30/100μm) to stick on the test area, and the magnetic traces should be clearly displayed after magnetization.


4. Testing steps

  1. magnetization

    • Yoke method : pole spacing ≤ 200mm, magnetization time 1~3 seconds.

    • Continuous method : Magnetizing while applying magnetic powder (recommended).

    • Residual magnetism method : only applicable to materials with high residual magnetism (magnetization is required before powder spraying).

  2. Applying magnetic powder

    • Wet method : spray magnetic suspension (concentration 1.5~3.0g/L).

    • Dry method : suitable for rough surfaces (such as thread roots).

  3. Observation and Recording

    • Under natural light (non-fluorescent magnetic powder): black/red magnetic traces.

    • Under UV light (fluorescent magnetic powder): bright green magnetic traces (more sensitive).

    • Take photos and archive : record the defect location, length and shape.

  4. Demagnetization (if necessary)

    • If the hook needs to be machined later or to avoid magnetic field interference, it needs to be demagnetized with a demagnetizer.


V. Defect Assessment and Acceptance Criteria

1. Common defect magnetic trace characteristics

Defect Type Magnetic trace characteristics
crack Slender, tortuous, with obvious magnetic powder aggregation
fold Straight or curved, consistent with the processing direction
Pores Point-shaped or short-strip scattered magnetic traces
Inclusion Irregular cluster magnetic traces

2. Acceptance criteria (GB/T 15822)

  • Not allowed :

    • Any visible cracks or transverse defects .

    • Linear defect length >2mm (critical stress area).

  • Allowed :

    • Single point defect ≤ 1mm , spacing ≥ 10mm .


6. Safety precautions

  1. Explosion-proof requirements : Oil-based carrier fluids are prohibited in flammable environments.

  2. UV protection : Wear UV-proof glasses during fluorescent testing.

  3. Equipment inspection : The yoke is well insulated to avoid the risk of electric shock.


7. Magnetic Particle Testing vs. Ultrasonic Testing (UT)

Comparison Items Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) Ultrasonic testing (UT)
Detection depth Surface/near surface (≤5mm) Internal (up to several hundred mm)
Defect Type Cracks, folds, pores Cracks, inclusions, delamination
efficiency High (fast scan) Medium (need coupling agent)
Applicable Materials Ferromagnetic materials only Metal/non-metal

Recommendation : MT+UT combined testing should be used for the key stress-bearing areas of the hook (hook neck and hook bottom) .


8. Typical Cases

  • Case 1 : Crane hook fracture accident in a steel plant

    • MT testing found : 3mm fatigue crack in the hook neck transition area.

    • Cause : Long-term overload + corrosion leads to crack expansion.

  • Case 2 : Cracking of weld seam of port hook anti-drop device

    • MT detection found : unfused defects in the heat affected zone of welding.


IX. Future Development Trends

  1. Automated magnetic particle testing : robot scanning + AI image recognition.

  2. High-sensitivity magnetic powder : Nano magnetic powder improves the detection rate of tiny defects.


Summarize

Magnetic particle testing is the preferred method for detecting surface defects on crane hooks . It is easy to operate, low cost and highly sensitive. It must be strictly implemented according to the standards and combined with ultrasonic testing (UT) for all-round testing to ensure the safe use of the hook.

Inquiry

Please leave us your requirements, we will contact you soon.

  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *