Magnetic particle testing method for crane hooks
Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) is a non-destructive testing technology used to detect surface and near-surface defects (cracks, folds, inclusions, etc.) of ferromagnetic materials (such as crane hooks). Its principle is to use a magnetic field to generate a leakage magnetic field at the defect, which absorbs magnetic particles to form a visible indication.
1. Scope of application
- 
	Applicable materials : ferromagnetic materials (carbon steel, alloy steel, etc.). 
- 
	Detection defect type : - 
		Surface cracks (such as fatigue cracks, stress cracks) 
- 
		Near surface defects (depth ≤ 5 mm) 
- 
		Welding defects (such as lack of fusion, porosity) 
 
- 
		
- 
	Applicable standards : - 
		GB/T 15822-2020 Non-destructive testing - magnetic particle testing 
- 
		JB/T 6061-2007 Test pieces for non-destructive testing of magnetic particle 
- 
		TSG Q7015-2016 (Rules for Periodic Inspection of Lifting Machinery) 
 
- 
		
2. Testing equipment and materials
| project | Require | 
|---|---|
| Magnetization equipment | AC/DC yoke, portable magnetic particle flaw detector (magnetizing current ≥ 1000A) | 
| Magnetic Powder Type | Fluorescent magnetic particles (UV light detection) or black/red non-fluorescent magnetic particles | 
| Carrier fluid | Water-based or oil-based suspension (in accordance with JB/T 6063 standard) | 
| UV light (optional) | Wavelength 365nm, intensity ≥1000μW/cm² (fluorescence method) | 
| Standard test piece | Type A1 (30/100μm) or Type C (for sensitivity verification) | 
3. Preparation before testing
1. Hook surface treatment
- 
	Cleaning : Remove oil, rust and paint (grind to Ra≤12.5μm). 
- 
	Drying : Make sure there is no moisture on the surface to avoid affecting the adsorption of magnetic powder. 
2. Magnetization method selection
| Magnetization method | Applicable scenarios | Pros and Cons | 
|---|---|---|
| Yoke method (AC/DC) | Local inspection (hook neck, hook bottom) | Portable, but requires multiple magnetization | 
| Power-on method (direct power-on) | Overall inspection (hook handle) | Large detection depth, but good contact is required | 
| Coil method (indirect magnetization) | Long rod-like parts (hook handle thread) | Suitable for longitudinal crack detection | 
3. Sensitivity Verification
- 
	Use A1 test piece (30/100μm) to stick on the test area, and the magnetic traces should be clearly displayed after magnetization. 
4. Testing steps
- 
	magnetization - 
		Yoke method : pole spacing ≤ 200mm, magnetization time 1~3 seconds. 
- 
		Continuous method : Magnetizing while applying magnetic powder (recommended). 
- 
		Residual magnetism method : only applicable to materials with high residual magnetism (magnetization is required before powder spraying). 
 
- 
		
- 
	Applying magnetic powder - 
		Wet method : spray magnetic suspension (concentration 1.5~3.0g/L). 
- 
		Dry method : suitable for rough surfaces (such as thread roots). 
 
- 
		
- 
	Observation and Recording - 
		Under natural light (non-fluorescent magnetic powder): black/red magnetic traces. 
- 
		Under UV light (fluorescent magnetic powder): bright green magnetic traces (more sensitive). 
- 
		Take photos and archive : record the defect location, length and shape. 
 
- 
		
- 
	Demagnetization (if necessary) - 
		If the hook needs to be machined later or to avoid magnetic field interference, it needs to be demagnetized with a demagnetizer. 
 
- 
		
V. Defect Assessment and Acceptance Criteria
1. Common defect magnetic trace characteristics
| Defect Type | Magnetic trace characteristics | 
|---|---|
| crack | Slender, tortuous, with obvious magnetic powder aggregation | 
| fold | Straight or curved, consistent with the processing direction | 
| Pores | Point-shaped or short-strip scattered magnetic traces | 
| Inclusion | Irregular cluster magnetic traces | 
2. Acceptance criteria (GB/T 15822)
- 
	Not allowed : - 
		Any visible cracks or transverse defects . 
- 
		Linear defect length >2mm (critical stress area). 
 
- 
		
- 
	Allowed : - 
		Single point defect ≤ 1mm , spacing ≥ 10mm . 
 
- 
		
6. Safety precautions
- 
	Explosion-proof requirements : Oil-based carrier fluids are prohibited in flammable environments. 
- 
	UV protection : Wear UV-proof glasses during fluorescent testing. 
- 
	Equipment inspection : The yoke is well insulated to avoid the risk of electric shock. 
7. Magnetic Particle Testing vs. Ultrasonic Testing (UT)
| Comparison Items | Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) | Ultrasonic testing (UT) | 
|---|---|---|
| Detection depth | Surface/near surface (≤5mm) | Internal (up to several hundred mm) | 
| Defect Type | Cracks, folds, pores | Cracks, inclusions, delamination | 
| efficiency | High (fast scan) | Medium (need coupling agent) | 
| Applicable Materials | Ferromagnetic materials only | Metal/non-metal | 
Recommendation : MT+UT combined testing should be used for the key stress-bearing areas of the hook (hook neck and hook bottom) .
8. Typical Cases
- 
	Case 1 : crane hook fracture accident in a steel plant - 
		MT testing found : 3mm fatigue crack in the hook neck transition area. 
- 
		Cause : Long-term overload + corrosion leads to crack expansion. 
 
- 
		
- 
	Case 2 : Cracking of weld seam of port hook anti-drop device - 
		MT detection found : unfused defects in the heat affected zone of welding. 
 
- 
		
IX. Future Development Trends
- 
	Automated magnetic particle testing : robot scanning + AI image recognition. 
- 
	High-sensitivity magnetic powder : Nano magnetic powder improves the detection rate of tiny defects. 
Summarize
Magnetic particle testing is the preferred method for detecting surface defects on crane hooks . It is easy to operate, low cost and highly sensitive. It must be strictly implemented according to the standards and combined with ultrasonic testing (UT) for all-round testing to ensure the safe use of the hook.
Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) is a non-destructive testing technology used to detect surface and near-surface defects (cracks, folds, inclusions, etc.) of ferromagnetic materials (such as crane hooks). Its principle is to use a magnetic field to generate a leakage magnetic field at the defect, which absorbs magnetic particles to form a visible indication.
1. Scope of application
- 
	Applicable materials : ferromagnetic materials (carbon steel, alloy steel, etc.). 
- 
	Detection defect type : - 
		Surface cracks (such as fatigue cracks, stress cracks) 
- 
		Near surface defects (depth ≤ 5 mm) 
- 
		Welding defects (such as lack of fusion, porosity) 
 
- 
		
- 
	Applicable standards : - 
		GB/T 15822-2020 Non-destructive testing - magnetic particle testing 
- 
		JB/T 6061-2007 Test pieces for non-destructive testing of magnetic particle 
- 
		TSG Q7015-2016 (Rules for Periodic Inspection of Lifting Machinery) 
 
- 
		
2. Testing equipment and materials
| project | Require | 
|---|---|
| Magnetization equipment | AC/DC yoke, portable magnetic particle flaw detector (magnetizing current ≥ 1000A) | 
| Magnetic Powder Type | Fluorescent magnetic particles (UV light detection) or black/red non-fluorescent magnetic particles | 
| Carrier fluid | Water-based or oil-based suspension (in accordance with JB/T 6063 standard) | 
| UV light (optional) | Wavelength 365nm, intensity ≥1000μW/cm² (fluorescence method) | 
| Standard test piece | Type A1 (30/100μm) or Type C (for sensitivity verification) | 
3. Preparation before testing
1. Hook surface treatment
- 
	Cleaning : Remove oil, rust and paint (grind to Ra≤12.5μm). 
- 
	Drying : Make sure there is no moisture on the surface to avoid affecting the adsorption of magnetic powder. 
2. Magnetization method selection
| Magnetization method | Applicable scenarios | Pros and Cons | 
|---|---|---|
| Yoke method (AC/DC) | Local inspection (hook neck, hook bottom) | Portable, but requires multiple magnetization | 
| Power-on method (direct power-on) | Overall inspection (hook handle) | Large detection depth, but good contact is required | 
| Coil method (indirect magnetization) | Long rod-like parts (hook handle thread) | Suitable for longitudinal crack detection | 
3. Sensitivity Verification
- 
	Use A1 test piece (30/100μm) to stick on the test area, and the magnetic traces should be clearly displayed after magnetization. 
4. Testing steps
- 
	magnetization - 
		Yoke method : pole spacing ≤ 200mm, magnetization time 1~3 seconds. 
- 
		Continuous method : Magnetizing while applying magnetic powder (recommended). 
- 
		Residual magnetism method : only applicable to materials with high residual magnetism (magnetization is required before powder spraying). 
 
- 
		
- 
	Applying magnetic powder - 
		Wet method : spray magnetic suspension (concentration 1.5~3.0g/L). 
- 
		Dry method : suitable for rough surfaces (such as thread roots). 
 
- 
		
- 
	Observation and Recording - 
		Under natural light (non-fluorescent magnetic powder): black/red magnetic traces. 
- 
		Under UV light (fluorescent magnetic powder): bright green magnetic traces (more sensitive). 
- 
		Take photos and archive : record the defect location, length and shape. 
 
- 
		
- 
	Demagnetization (if necessary) - 
		If the hook needs to be machined later or to avoid magnetic field interference, it needs to be demagnetized with a demagnetizer. 
 
- 
		
V. Defect Assessment and Acceptance Criteria
1. Common defect magnetic trace characteristics
| Defect Type | Magnetic trace characteristics | 
|---|---|
| crack | Slender, tortuous, with obvious magnetic powder aggregation | 
| fold | Straight or curved, consistent with the processing direction | 
| Pores | Point-shaped or short-strip scattered magnetic traces | 
| Inclusion | Irregular cluster magnetic traces | 
2. Acceptance criteria (GB/T 15822)
- 
	Not allowed : - 
		Any visible cracks or transverse defects . 
- 
		Linear defect length >2mm (critical stress area). 
 
- 
		
- 
	Allowed : - 
		Single point defect ≤ 1mm , spacing ≥ 10mm . 
 
- 
		
6. Safety precautions
- 
	Explosion-proof requirements : Oil-based carrier fluids are prohibited in flammable environments. 
- 
	UV protection : Wear UV-proof glasses during fluorescent testing. 
- 
	Equipment inspection : The yoke is well insulated to avoid the risk of electric shock. 
7. Magnetic Particle Testing vs. Ultrasonic Testing (UT)
| Comparison Items | Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) | Ultrasonic testing (UT) | 
|---|---|---|
| Detection depth | Surface/near surface (≤5mm) | Internal (up to several hundred mm) | 
| Defect Type | Cracks, folds, pores | Cracks, inclusions, delamination | 
| efficiency | High (fast scan) | Medium (need coupling agent) | 
| Applicable Materials | Ferromagnetic materials only | Metal/non-metal | 
Recommendation : MT+UT combined testing should be used for the key stress-bearing areas of the hook (hook neck and hook bottom) .
8. Typical Cases
- 
	Case 1 : Crane hook fracture accident in a steel plant - 
		MT testing found : 3mm fatigue crack in the hook neck transition area. 
- 
		Cause : Long-term overload + corrosion leads to crack expansion. 
 
- 
		
- 
	Case 2 : Cracking of weld seam of port hook anti-drop device - 
		MT detection found : unfused defects in the heat affected zone of welding. 
 
- 
		
IX. Future Development Trends
- 
	Automated magnetic particle testing : robot scanning + AI image recognition. 
- 
	High-sensitivity magnetic powder : Nano magnetic powder improves the detection rate of tiny defects. 
Summarize
Magnetic particle testing is the preferred method for detecting surface defects on crane hooks . It is easy to operate, low cost and highly sensitive. It must be strictly implemented according to the standards and combined with ultrasonic testing (UT) for all-round testing to ensure the safe use of the hook.
Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) is a non-destructive testing technology used to detect surface and near-surface defects (cracks, folds, inclusions, etc.) of ferromagnetic materials (such as crane hooks). Its principle is to use a magnetic field to generate a leakage magnetic field at the defect, which absorbs magnetic particles to form a visible indication.
1. Scope of application
- 
	Applicable materials : ferromagnetic materials (carbon steel, alloy steel, etc.). 
- 
	Detection defect type : - 
		Surface cracks (such as fatigue cracks, stress cracks) 
- 
		Near surface defects (depth ≤ 5 mm) 
- 
		Welding defects (such as lack of fusion, porosity) 
 
- 
		
- 
	Applicable standards : - 
		GB/T 15822-2020 Non-destructive testing - magnetic particle testing 
- 
		JB/T 6061-2007 Test pieces for non-destructive testing of magnetic particle 
- 
		TSG Q7015-2016 (Rules for Periodic Inspection of Lifting Machinery) 
 
- 
		
2. Testing equipment and materials
| project | Require | 
|---|---|
| Magnetization equipment | AC/DC yoke, portable magnetic particle flaw detector (magnetizing current ≥ 1000A) | 
| Magnetic Powder Type | Fluorescent magnetic particles (UV light detection) or black/red non-fluorescent magnetic particles | 
| Carrier fluid | Water-based or oil-based suspension (in accordance with JB/T 6063 standard) | 
| UV light (optional) | Wavelength 365nm, intensity ≥1000μW/cm² (fluorescence method) | 
| Standard test piece | Type A1 (30/100μm) or Type C (for sensitivity verification) | 
3. Preparation before testing
1. Hook surface treatment
- 
	Cleaning : Remove oil, rust and paint (grind to Ra≤12.5μm). 
- 
	Drying : Make sure there is no moisture on the surface to avoid affecting the adsorption of magnetic powder. 
2. Magnetization method selection
| Magnetization method | Applicable scenarios | Pros and Cons | 
|---|---|---|
| Yoke method (AC/DC) | Local inspection (hook neck, hook bottom) | Portable, but requires multiple magnetization | 
| Power-on method (direct power-on) | Overall inspection (hook handle) | Large detection depth, but good contact is required | 
| Coil method (indirect magnetization) | Long rod-like parts (hook handle thread) | Suitable for longitudinal crack detection | 
3. Sensitivity Verification
- 
	Use A1 test piece (30/100μm) to stick on the test area, and the magnetic traces should be clearly displayed after magnetization. 
4. Testing steps
- 
	magnetization - 
		Yoke method : pole spacing ≤ 200mm, magnetization time 1~3 seconds. 
- 
		Continuous method : Magnetizing while applying magnetic powder (recommended). 
- 
		Residual magnetism method : only applicable to materials with high residual magnetism (magnetization is required before powder spraying). 
 
- 
		
- 
	Applying magnetic powder - 
		Wet method : spray magnetic suspension (concentration 1.5~3.0g/L). 
- 
		Dry method : suitable for rough surfaces (such as thread roots). 
 
- 
		
- 
	Observation and Recording - 
		Under natural light (non-fluorescent magnetic powder): black/red magnetic traces. 
- 
		Under UV light (fluorescent magnetic powder): bright green magnetic traces (more sensitive). 
- 
		Take photos and archive : record the defect location, length and shape. 
 
- 
		
- 
	Demagnetization (if necessary) - 
		If the hook needs to be machined later or to avoid magnetic field interference, it needs to be demagnetized with a demagnetizer. 
 
- 
		
V. Defect Assessment and Acceptance Criteria
1. Common defect magnetic trace characteristics
| Defect Type | Magnetic trace characteristics | 
|---|---|
| crack | Slender, tortuous, with obvious magnetic powder aggregation | 
| fold | Straight or curved, consistent with the processing direction | 
| Pores | Point-shaped or short-strip scattered magnetic traces | 
| Inclusion | Irregular cluster magnetic traces | 
2. Acceptance criteria (GB/T 15822)
- 
	Not allowed : - 
		Any visible cracks or transverse defects . 
- 
		Linear defect length >2mm (critical stress area). 
 
- 
		
- 
	Allowed : - 
		Single point defect ≤ 1mm , spacing ≥ 10mm . 
 
- 
		
6. Safety precautions
- 
	Explosion-proof requirements : Oil-based carrier fluids are prohibited in flammable environments. 
- 
	UV protection : Wear UV-proof glasses during fluorescent testing. 
- 
	Equipment inspection : The yoke is well insulated to avoid the risk of electric shock. 
7. Magnetic Particle Testing vs. Ultrasonic Testing (UT)
| Comparison Items | Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) | Ultrasonic testing (UT) | 
|---|---|---|
| Detection depth | Surface/near surface (≤5mm) | Internal (up to several hundred mm) | 
| Defect Type | Cracks, folds, pores | Cracks, inclusions, delamination | 
| efficiency | High (fast scan) | Medium (need coupling agent) | 
| Applicable Materials | Ferromagnetic materials only | Metal/non-metal | 
Recommendation : MT+UT combined testing should be used for the key stress-bearing areas of the hook (hook neck and hook bottom) .
8. Typical Cases
- 
	Case 1 : Crane hook fracture accident in a steel plant - 
		MT testing found : 3mm fatigue crack in the hook neck transition area. 
- 
		Cause : Long-term overload + corrosion leads to crack expansion. 
 
- 
		
- 
	Case 2 : Cracking of weld seam of port hook anti-drop device - 
		MT detection found : unfused defects in the heat affected zone of welding. 
 
- 
		
IX. Future Development Trends
- 
	Automated magnetic particle testing : robot scanning + AI image recognition. 
- 
	High-sensitivity magnetic powder : Nano magnetic powder improves the detection rate of tiny defects. 
Summarize
Magnetic particle testing is the preferred method for detecting surface defects on crane hooks . It is easy to operate, low cost and highly sensitive. It must be strictly implemented according to the standards and combined with ultrasonic testing (UT) for all-round testing to ensure the safe use of the hook.
Inquiry
Please leave us your requirements, we will contact you soon.

