Magnetic particle testing method for crane hooks
Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) is a non-destructive testing technology used to detect surface and near-surface defects (cracks, folds, inclusions, etc.) of ferromagnetic materials (such as crane hooks). Its principle is to use a magnetic field to generate a leakage magnetic field at the defect, which absorbs magnetic particles to form a visible indication.
1. Scope of application
-
Applicable materials : ferromagnetic materials (carbon steel, alloy steel, etc.).
-
Detection defect type :
-
Surface cracks (such as fatigue cracks, stress cracks)
-
Near surface defects (depth ≤ 5 mm)
-
Welding defects (such as lack of fusion, porosity)
-
-
Applicable standards :
-
GB/T 15822-2020 Non-destructive testing - magnetic particle testing
-
JB/T 6061-2007 Test pieces for non-destructive testing of magnetic particle
-
TSG Q7015-2016 (Rules for Periodic Inspection of Lifting Machinery)
-
2. Testing equipment and materials
project | Require |
---|---|
Magnetization equipment | AC/DC yoke, portable magnetic particle flaw detector (magnetizing current ≥ 1000A) |
Magnetic Powder Type | Fluorescent magnetic particles (UV light detection) or black/red non-fluorescent magnetic particles |
Carrier fluid | Water-based or oil-based suspension (in accordance with JB/T 6063 standard) |
UV light (optional) | Wavelength 365nm, intensity ≥1000μW/cm² (fluorescence method) |
Standard test piece | Type A1 (30/100μm) or Type C (for sensitivity verification) |
3. Preparation before testing
1. Hook surface treatment
-
Cleaning : Remove oil, rust and paint (grind to Ra≤12.5μm).
-
Drying : Make sure there is no moisture on the surface to avoid affecting the adsorption of magnetic powder.
2. Magnetization method selection
Magnetization method | Applicable scenarios | Pros and Cons |
---|---|---|
Yoke method (AC/DC) | Local inspection (hook neck, hook bottom) | Portable, but requires multiple magnetization |
Power-on method (direct power-on) | Overall inspection (hook handle) | Large detection depth, but good contact is required |
Coil method (indirect magnetization) | Long rod-like parts (hook handle thread) | Suitable for longitudinal crack detection |
3. Sensitivity Verification
-
Use A1 test piece (30/100μm) to stick on the test area, and the magnetic traces should be clearly displayed after magnetization.
4. Testing steps
-
magnetization
-
Yoke method : pole spacing ≤ 200mm, magnetization time 1~3 seconds.
-
Continuous method : Magnetizing while applying magnetic powder (recommended).
-
Residual magnetism method : only applicable to materials with high residual magnetism (magnetization is required before powder spraying).
-
-
Applying magnetic powder
-
Wet method : spray magnetic suspension (concentration 1.5~3.0g/L).
-
Dry method : suitable for rough surfaces (such as thread roots).
-
-
Observation and Recording
-
Under natural light (non-fluorescent magnetic powder): black/red magnetic traces.
-
Under UV light (fluorescent magnetic powder): bright green magnetic traces (more sensitive).
-
Take photos and archive : record the defect location, length and shape.
-
-
Demagnetization (if necessary)
-
If the hook needs to be machined later or to avoid magnetic field interference, it needs to be demagnetized with a demagnetizer.
-
V. Defect Assessment and Acceptance Criteria
1. Common defect magnetic trace characteristics
Defect Type | Magnetic trace characteristics |
---|---|
crack | Slender, tortuous, with obvious magnetic powder aggregation |
fold | Straight or curved, consistent with the processing direction |
Pores | Point-shaped or short-strip scattered magnetic traces |
Inclusion | Irregular cluster magnetic traces |
2. Acceptance criteria (GB/T 15822)
-
Not allowed :
-
Any visible cracks or transverse defects .
-
Linear defect length >2mm (critical stress area).
-
-
Allowed :
-
Single point defect ≤ 1mm , spacing ≥ 10mm .
-
6. Safety precautions
-
Explosion-proof requirements : Oil-based carrier fluids are prohibited in flammable environments.
-
UV protection : Wear UV-proof glasses during fluorescent testing.
-
Equipment inspection : The yoke is well insulated to avoid the risk of electric shock.
7. Magnetic Particle Testing vs. Ultrasonic Testing (UT)
Comparison Items | Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) | Ultrasonic testing (UT) |
---|---|---|
Detection depth | Surface/near surface (≤5mm) | Internal (up to several hundred mm) |
Defect Type | Cracks, folds, pores | Cracks, inclusions, delamination |
efficiency | High (fast scan) | Medium (need coupling agent) |
Applicable Materials | Ferromagnetic materials only | Metal/non-metal |
Recommendation : MT+UT combined testing should be used for the key stress-bearing areas of the hook (hook neck and hook bottom) .
8. Typical Cases
-
Case 1 : crane hook fracture accident in a steel plant
-
MT testing found : 3mm fatigue crack in the hook neck transition area.
-
Cause : Long-term overload + corrosion leads to crack expansion.
-
-
Case 2 : Cracking of weld seam of port hook anti-drop device
-
MT detection found : unfused defects in the heat affected zone of welding.
-
IX. Future Development Trends
-
Automated magnetic particle testing : robot scanning + AI image recognition.
-
High-sensitivity magnetic powder : Nano magnetic powder improves the detection rate of tiny defects.
Summarize
Magnetic particle testing is the preferred method for detecting surface defects on crane hooks . It is easy to operate, low cost and highly sensitive. It must be strictly implemented according to the standards and combined with ultrasonic testing (UT) for all-round testing to ensure the safe use of the hook.
Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) is a non-destructive testing technology used to detect surface and near-surface defects (cracks, folds, inclusions, etc.) of ferromagnetic materials (such as crane hooks). Its principle is to use a magnetic field to generate a leakage magnetic field at the defect, which absorbs magnetic particles to form a visible indication.
1. Scope of application
-
Applicable materials : ferromagnetic materials (carbon steel, alloy steel, etc.).
-
Detection defect type :
-
Surface cracks (such as fatigue cracks, stress cracks)
-
Near surface defects (depth ≤ 5 mm)
-
Welding defects (such as lack of fusion, porosity)
-
-
Applicable standards :
-
GB/T 15822-2020 Non-destructive testing - magnetic particle testing
-
JB/T 6061-2007 Test pieces for non-destructive testing of magnetic particle
-
TSG Q7015-2016 (Rules for Periodic Inspection of Lifting Machinery)
-
2. Testing equipment and materials
project | Require |
---|---|
Magnetization equipment | AC/DC yoke, portable magnetic particle flaw detector (magnetizing current ≥ 1000A) |
Magnetic Powder Type | Fluorescent magnetic particles (UV light detection) or black/red non-fluorescent magnetic particles |
Carrier fluid | Water-based or oil-based suspension (in accordance with JB/T 6063 standard) |
UV light (optional) | Wavelength 365nm, intensity ≥1000μW/cm² (fluorescence method) |
Standard test piece | Type A1 (30/100μm) or Type C (for sensitivity verification) |
3. Preparation before testing
1. Hook surface treatment
-
Cleaning : Remove oil, rust and paint (grind to Ra≤12.5μm).
-
Drying : Make sure there is no moisture on the surface to avoid affecting the adsorption of magnetic powder.
2. Magnetization method selection
Magnetization method | Applicable scenarios | Pros and Cons |
---|---|---|
Yoke method (AC/DC) | Local inspection (hook neck, hook bottom) | Portable, but requires multiple magnetization |
Power-on method (direct power-on) | Overall inspection (hook handle) | Large detection depth, but good contact is required |
Coil method (indirect magnetization) | Long rod-like parts (hook handle thread) | Suitable for longitudinal crack detection |
3. Sensitivity Verification
-
Use A1 test piece (30/100μm) to stick on the test area, and the magnetic traces should be clearly displayed after magnetization.
4. Testing steps
-
magnetization
-
Yoke method : pole spacing ≤ 200mm, magnetization time 1~3 seconds.
-
Continuous method : Magnetizing while applying magnetic powder (recommended).
-
Residual magnetism method : only applicable to materials with high residual magnetism (magnetization is required before powder spraying).
-
-
Applying magnetic powder
-
Wet method : spray magnetic suspension (concentration 1.5~3.0g/L).
-
Dry method : suitable for rough surfaces (such as thread roots).
-
-
Observation and Recording
-
Under natural light (non-fluorescent magnetic powder): black/red magnetic traces.
-
Under UV light (fluorescent magnetic powder): bright green magnetic traces (more sensitive).
-
Take photos and archive : record the defect location, length and shape.
-
-
Demagnetization (if necessary)
-
If the hook needs to be machined later or to avoid magnetic field interference, it needs to be demagnetized with a demagnetizer.
-
V. Defect Assessment and Acceptance Criteria
1. Common defect magnetic trace characteristics
Defect Type | Magnetic trace characteristics |
---|---|
crack | Slender, tortuous, with obvious magnetic powder aggregation |
fold | Straight or curved, consistent with the processing direction |
Pores | Point-shaped or short-strip scattered magnetic traces |
Inclusion | Irregular cluster magnetic traces |
2. Acceptance criteria (GB/T 15822)
-
Not allowed :
-
Any visible cracks or transverse defects .
-
Linear defect length >2mm (critical stress area).
-
-
Allowed :
-
Single point defect ≤ 1mm , spacing ≥ 10mm .
-
6. Safety precautions
-
Explosion-proof requirements : Oil-based carrier fluids are prohibited in flammable environments.
-
UV protection : Wear UV-proof glasses during fluorescent testing.
-
Equipment inspection : The yoke is well insulated to avoid the risk of electric shock.
7. Magnetic Particle Testing vs. Ultrasonic Testing (UT)
Comparison Items | Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) | Ultrasonic testing (UT) |
---|---|---|
Detection depth | Surface/near surface (≤5mm) | Internal (up to several hundred mm) |
Defect Type | Cracks, folds, pores | Cracks, inclusions, delamination |
efficiency | High (fast scan) | Medium (need coupling agent) |
Applicable Materials | Ferromagnetic materials only | Metal/non-metal |
Recommendation : MT+UT combined testing should be used for the key stress-bearing areas of the hook (hook neck and hook bottom) .
8. Typical Cases
-
Case 1 : Crane hook fracture accident in a steel plant
-
MT testing found : 3mm fatigue crack in the hook neck transition area.
-
Cause : Long-term overload + corrosion leads to crack expansion.
-
-
Case 2 : Cracking of weld seam of port hook anti-drop device
-
MT detection found : unfused defects in the heat affected zone of welding.
-
IX. Future Development Trends
-
Automated magnetic particle testing : robot scanning + AI image recognition.
-
High-sensitivity magnetic powder : Nano magnetic powder improves the detection rate of tiny defects.
Summarize
Magnetic particle testing is the preferred method for detecting surface defects on crane hooks . It is easy to operate, low cost and highly sensitive. It must be strictly implemented according to the standards and combined with ultrasonic testing (UT) for all-round testing to ensure the safe use of the hook.
Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) is a non-destructive testing technology used to detect surface and near-surface defects (cracks, folds, inclusions, etc.) of ferromagnetic materials (such as crane hooks). Its principle is to use a magnetic field to generate a leakage magnetic field at the defect, which absorbs magnetic particles to form a visible indication.
1. Scope of application
-
Applicable materials : ferromagnetic materials (carbon steel, alloy steel, etc.).
-
Detection defect type :
-
Surface cracks (such as fatigue cracks, stress cracks)
-
Near surface defects (depth ≤ 5 mm)
-
Welding defects (such as lack of fusion, porosity)
-
-
Applicable standards :
-
GB/T 15822-2020 Non-destructive testing - magnetic particle testing
-
JB/T 6061-2007 Test pieces for non-destructive testing of magnetic particle
-
TSG Q7015-2016 (Rules for Periodic Inspection of Lifting Machinery)
-
2. Testing equipment and materials
project | Require |
---|---|
Magnetization equipment | AC/DC yoke, portable magnetic particle flaw detector (magnetizing current ≥ 1000A) |
Magnetic Powder Type | Fluorescent magnetic particles (UV light detection) or black/red non-fluorescent magnetic particles |
Carrier fluid | Water-based or oil-based suspension (in accordance with JB/T 6063 standard) |
UV light (optional) | Wavelength 365nm, intensity ≥1000μW/cm² (fluorescence method) |
Standard test piece | Type A1 (30/100μm) or Type C (for sensitivity verification) |
3. Preparation before testing
1. Hook surface treatment
-
Cleaning : Remove oil, rust and paint (grind to Ra≤12.5μm).
-
Drying : Make sure there is no moisture on the surface to avoid affecting the adsorption of magnetic powder.
2. Magnetization method selection
Magnetization method | Applicable scenarios | Pros and Cons |
---|---|---|
Yoke method (AC/DC) | Local inspection (hook neck, hook bottom) | Portable, but requires multiple magnetization |
Power-on method (direct power-on) | Overall inspection (hook handle) | Large detection depth, but good contact is required |
Coil method (indirect magnetization) | Long rod-like parts (hook handle thread) | Suitable for longitudinal crack detection |
3. Sensitivity Verification
-
Use A1 test piece (30/100μm) to stick on the test area, and the magnetic traces should be clearly displayed after magnetization.
4. Testing steps
-
magnetization
-
Yoke method : pole spacing ≤ 200mm, magnetization time 1~3 seconds.
-
Continuous method : Magnetizing while applying magnetic powder (recommended).
-
Residual magnetism method : only applicable to materials with high residual magnetism (magnetization is required before powder spraying).
-
-
Applying magnetic powder
-
Wet method : spray magnetic suspension (concentration 1.5~3.0g/L).
-
Dry method : suitable for rough surfaces (such as thread roots).
-
-
Observation and Recording
-
Under natural light (non-fluorescent magnetic powder): black/red magnetic traces.
-
Under UV light (fluorescent magnetic powder): bright green magnetic traces (more sensitive).
-
Take photos and archive : record the defect location, length and shape.
-
-
Demagnetization (if necessary)
-
If the hook needs to be machined later or to avoid magnetic field interference, it needs to be demagnetized with a demagnetizer.
-
V. Defect Assessment and Acceptance Criteria
1. Common defect magnetic trace characteristics
Defect Type | Magnetic trace characteristics |
---|---|
crack | Slender, tortuous, with obvious magnetic powder aggregation |
fold | Straight or curved, consistent with the processing direction |
Pores | Point-shaped or short-strip scattered magnetic traces |
Inclusion | Irregular cluster magnetic traces |
2. Acceptance criteria (GB/T 15822)
-
Not allowed :
-
Any visible cracks or transverse defects .
-
Linear defect length >2mm (critical stress area).
-
-
Allowed :
-
Single point defect ≤ 1mm , spacing ≥ 10mm .
-
6. Safety precautions
-
Explosion-proof requirements : Oil-based carrier fluids are prohibited in flammable environments.
-
UV protection : Wear UV-proof glasses during fluorescent testing.
-
Equipment inspection : The yoke is well insulated to avoid the risk of electric shock.
7. Magnetic Particle Testing vs. Ultrasonic Testing (UT)
Comparison Items | Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) | Ultrasonic testing (UT) |
---|---|---|
Detection depth | Surface/near surface (≤5mm) | Internal (up to several hundred mm) |
Defect Type | Cracks, folds, pores | Cracks, inclusions, delamination |
efficiency | High (fast scan) | Medium (need coupling agent) |
Applicable Materials | Ferromagnetic materials only | Metal/non-metal |
Recommendation : MT+UT combined testing should be used for the key stress-bearing areas of the hook (hook neck and hook bottom) .
8. Typical Cases
-
Case 1 : Crane hook fracture accident in a steel plant
-
MT testing found : 3mm fatigue crack in the hook neck transition area.
-
Cause : Long-term overload + corrosion leads to crack expansion.
-
-
Case 2 : Cracking of weld seam of port hook anti-drop device
-
MT detection found : unfused defects in the heat affected zone of welding.
-
IX. Future Development Trends
-
Automated magnetic particle testing : robot scanning + AI image recognition.
-
High-sensitivity magnetic powder : Nano magnetic powder improves the detection rate of tiny defects.
Summarize
Magnetic particle testing is the preferred method for detecting surface defects on crane hooks . It is easy to operate, low cost and highly sensitive. It must be strictly implemented according to the standards and combined with ultrasonic testing (UT) for all-round testing to ensure the safe use of the hook.
Inquiry
Please leave us your requirements, we will contact you soon.